Let me 'splain.
I'll start with Ha's comments, which were made last September in passing as part of an explanation for the huge delays behind his and Morrison's run on The Authority:
"First off, I don't think The Authority #3 by Grant Morrison and Gene Ha is ever coming out. Grant is busy redesigning the DC Universe and I've moved onto new projects."
I think that's the first place I'd seen reference to that idea of Morrison "redesigning the DC Universe," or at least put quite in terms quite that specific. We knew even then that Final Crisis was going to be another epic multiverse-shaking story, but little was known about what sort of result the series was going to have. (Honestly, we still don't know that much about it; DC's been doing a damn good job of not letting that particular secret slip.)
So we know (or can at least theorize with some degree of certainty) that when Morrison's done, the DCU will have been changed in some way, likely with his particular brand of highly imaginative neo-retro fusion. (Really, if you were going to redesign or modernize/futurize a comics universe from the ground up, wouldn't Grant Morrison be on or close to the top of your list of creators you'd want involved?)
The second bits of info which got my neurons rubbing together to form this wild-ass theory came from Chip Kidd when discussing the distinctive, if thus-far uninspiring, FC trade dress:
NRAMA: So what went into the process for Final Crisis’ look?
CK: Well, to start with Final Crisis - the big thing that no one would be able to know yet, and I won’t get too specific here, but for the people that think it’s a generic look – wait. By the third issue, you’ll start to get it. Basically, the trade dress dissolves. So, it’s starting out as something now, and by the second issue, it will be slightly different, the third issue, even more different, and between the third and fourth issue, I hope people will get it, and understand what we were doing all along. It might not make people like it any better, but they’ll at least understand what I have in mind. It’s an evolving trade dress. ... There are people who are in the talkbacks saying that DC is just riffing off Civil War, but again – wait and see. By the fourth issue, you’ll realize that’s not what we’re doing. We’re doing something else.
So the trade dress is going to start to dissolve and turn into something else which will be apparent -- or at least the direction will -- by the third or fourth issue. This implies to me either the current dress and logo will "fall away" to reveal something new underneath, or will degrade and reform into something new over the last half of the series' seven issues.
I don't think what's revealed or regrown will be simply a reworked presentation of what came before. I think it will be something entirely new.
I think the title of this series is going to change halfway through, or perhaps begin to change only to be complete at the end of the series.
Title and trade dress are important to Morrison. When he took over X-Men in 2001, he changed the name of the book to New X-Men precisely because he'd designed a logo for it which could be rotated 180 degrees and read the same. He had Marvel redesign the trade dress for all of the X-Men books to make them more visually distinct from the rest of Marvel's line. I think to him these elements of comic books have more meaning than beyond the simple graphic appeal of them -- while I'm not willing to say for sure it ties into Morrison's interest in magic, it's possible that it does, but at the very least ties into his penchant for meta-story. The trade dress of many of his books say something about the books themselves.
So I'm looking at the words "Final Crisis." And I know that Morrison is building a new DCU. And I know the trade dress is going to change. And I know that there's a tremendous battle halfway through the series which, I speculate, is going to result in the deaths of most or all of the DC heroes. And I know that Morrison's using Jack Kirby's Fourth World creations extensively in this series.
And while I can't say for sure exactly what's going to happen...
...I want to note that it wouldn't take a lot of work visually for the word "Crisis" to evolve into the word "Genesis." (New Genesis, remember, is Kirby's "good twin" of Darkseid's evil planet Apokalips.)
When this series becomes Something Genesis by issue #7, launching the shiny new Morrison-ized DCU, I want you to remember where you heard it first.
[1] That's not to dismiss the work of artist JG Jones, by the way; it's just that this particular notion of mine lies along the story and meta axes, so it's much more in Morrison's court than Jones'.


















Phoenix (Uncanny X-Men #137, 1980). (The first time only, please.) I was pretty new to the X-verse when Jean sacrificed herself to save the universe: I had only started reading UXM with issue 135, the tail end of the Dark Phoenix Saga, and the tragic, confused, supremely-powerful Jean Grey was already one of my favorite characters. UXM #136's cliffhanger, with most of the X-Men disappearing into space, gripped me in such a way I was sure I would die before #137 came out. Little did I realize, however, that Uncanny X-Men #137 was a double-sized issue, meaning that the local 7-11 where I bought my comics wouldn't carry it; I didn't catch on to that fact until #138 came out. And when I opened that issue and saw all those somber X-faces standing over Jean's tombstone... well, nine-year-old me took that hit pretty hard, I've gotta tell you.
Guardian (Alpha Flight v1 #12, 1983). Ah, the glorious spoiler-free advance-solicitation-free pre-Internet days. The cover of Alpha Flight #12 told us straight up that one of the Alphans would be biting it in that issue, and knowing that death was coming for one of the team had me almost in terror while reading this issue. As I got closer and closer to the end and it seemed more and more obvious that John Byrne had pegged Jim Hudson to die, I couldn't believe it: "No way can he kill Guardian!" thought I. "He's the team leader! The star of the book!" But kill him Byrne did, and in a way that I'm sure must have impressed on the mind of young Joss Whedon, too: Jim knows he's only got seconds left to keep his cybernetic suit from self-destructing -- and then his wife, Heather, comes in and distracts his attention, causing the suit to explode and consume Jim in front of her. Meaning that Heather had to watch her husband die and know that she effectively killed him. Powerful stuff, both for Heather Hudson... and for me.
Robin (Jason Todd) (Batman #428, 1988). I didn't particularly care that the Joker murdered Jason Todd -- I'd never really much cared for the second Robin, apparently much like the many, many people who called DC's special 900-number voting for him to die. But I was pretty shocked that DC actually went through with his death, not only because the character of Robin is so iconic (the mainstream press surely wouldn't have recognized that the Robin who died wasn't the one from the old Batman TV show, the only touchstone they seem to have for the Batman characters) but because they were murdering a kid. In a way it would've been less shocking had the Joker offed Batman... though they would've found a way to bring Bats back within months, instead of the nearly twenty years it took to bring back Jason Todd. 









Bloodwynd. Much like "Ten Worst Avengers" desginee Deathcry, Bloodwynd's suckitude starts with the grotesque mid-90's name, but surely doesn't end there. Turns out at first Bloodwynd was a mind-controlled Martian Manhunter in disguise, and then we found out that there was a real Bloodwynd who the Manhunter had been mimicking. That Bloodwynd was some sort of necromancer who wouldn't deign actually to do anything for the League on the grounds that he didn't want to disturb the natural order of things. Good thing the "natural order of things" for Bloodwynd was to quickly fade into obscurity. (I'll admit that I kinda dug his costume, though.)
Blue Jay. Is there any chance whatsoever that the name "Blue Jay" ever inspired fear into the hearts of any criminals anywhere? At least the Marvel hero of whom he was an analogue, Yellowjacket, had a name which could terrify bad guys allergic to bee stings. (C'mon... Blue Jay?)
Doctor Fate (Linda Strauss). This version of Doctor Fate makes the list thanks largely to the brevity of her run with the League which, if I'm remembering correctly, consisted almost entirely of the cover of Justice League America #31. I think Giffen and DeMatteis planned to keep her around longer, but events in her own book -- like her death -- scuttled those plans.
Geo-Force. I'm sorry, Brad Meltzer: he's not cool. Horrendous name, worse costume, not even a hundredth as interesting as his late half-sister, the original Terra. Also, I'm pretty sure that he's added absolutely nothing to Meltzer's run on the book, though we still have an issue left, so maybe he'll, y'know, do something seriously amazing then.
L-Ron/Despero. I liked L-Ron, the little robot who served as Maxwell Lord's majordomo during the Giffen/DeMatteis era -- he brought a welcome sense of snarky humor to the book (as opposed to the ridiculous humor most of the other characters brought). I like Despero as a villain for the JLA -- his brutal attack on that same League (featuring the supposed death of Mr. Miracle) was a highlight of the Giffen/DeMatteis run. Putting L-Ron's consciousness in Despero's body and making him a full League member? With a big gun? Seriously, who thought that was a good idea?
Mystek. Perhaps the character herself wasn't lame, or wouldn't have been if she'd been given the opportunity to develop, but she was knocked off almost as soon as she joined up with the Justice League Task Force. Writer Christopher Priest had intended her to be a creator-owned character starring in her own mini-series and had put her in JLTF to build some buzz for her. But DC nixed that mini-series, so Priest nixed Mystek.
Plastic Man. Yeah, you read me right. Plas always felt like an incongruous presence in the League and I never quite understood his continued membership past Morrison's "Godly Legion of Leaguers" roster -- it became "The Big Seven, Oh And Also By The Way Plastic Man." If I had to have a stretchy hero in the JLA, I'd much have preferred Elongated Man, who could bring the funny and had more depth to his character. Guess that's not happening anytime soon, though, is it?
Triumph. DC's version of Marvel's Sentry, but before Marvel got around to creating the Sentry. Triumph, apparently, was one of the original founders of the Justice League, but was removed from the timestream and erased from the memories of everyone everywhere. When he "came back" into the modern DCU, he was, frankly, an asshole. Theoretically, his assholishness was justified, since no one even remembered he'd ever existed -- I'm sure that would have hacked me off pretty good, too -- but it sure made for an unlikable character. In a vaguely ironic final twist on the "no one remembers Triumph" bit, a turned-into-glass-by-the-Spectre Triumph was still in the JLA Watchtower when Grant Morrison destroyed it, presumably destroying Triumph as well... not that anyone, including Morrison, seemed to remember. Or care.
Zan and Jayna, The Wonder Twins. The friggin' Wonder Twins?! In a book called Extreme Justice? Wow, this idea positively reeked of eau du nineties, didn't it? (Dr. Olsen's Fun Science Fact: That feeling in your brain you're getting while trying to reconcile "Wonder Twins" and "Extreme Justice"? That's what we like to call
I don't necessarily have a problem with any of these actors as I don't know who the hell most of them are. And I'm one of those guys who remembers names of actors, even little-known ones. This cast announcement feels more like they're gearing up to make Watchmen a made-for-cable-TV movie than a Big Hollywood Blockbuster Feature.



